Social Media and Email

Increasingly companies are adding social media to their marketing strategies.  This is an effective strategy as increasingly more consumers are engaging with social media sites. 
In fact  "In their State of Marketing 2015 report, Salesforce polled 5,000 marketers about their budgetary changes for this year and found that 70 percent of respondents planned to boost social media ad spend.  70 percent said that they will increase expenditure on organic (non-paid) social media marketing, too"
 

It is important to incorporate a social media in your overall strategy to promote engagement with your web site and hence your product and brand.  As discussed in an earlier blog, email marketing is a very low cost alternative to direct mail marketing; however it can be less effective overall.  Integrating social media in the email marketing efforts can be a strategy to enhance rather than replace marketing efforts.  Social Media is a way to promote your content – messages and promotions to prospective customers and stakeholders.

http://www.business2community.com/social-media/4-ways-increase-revenue-social-media-01236612#MFtFfwE640O3MFPG.97

A common practice among email marketers is to include links to your social media sites.

Nearly every major corporation and small businesses have or are planning to increase revenues with social media.  According to a study by Cone Communications, 93% of customers expect companies to have a presence on social media (Bedgood 2015).  Social media is an important marketing platform for both B2Cand B2B marketing with Facebook being the most dominate player.  The chart below is from the Social Media Examiner ((Bedgood, 2015) shows how marketers plan to use social media.  *(See article in business2 community.com by Lisa Bedgood, May 27, 2015, “4 Ways to Increase Revenue with Social Media”

Email can be used as product promotion or could be used to encouragement engagement on social media.  More often, companies are offering incentives such as product discounts, free shipping or sweepstakes contests for consumers to “Like” them on Facebook.  Another effective engagement is to get customers to follow your company and brand on Twitter or Pintrest.  All of these marketing initiatives together serve to bring more customers to your web site and gives you another opportunity to increase engagement.  You own the brand and the content on your web site, blog, Podcast or YouTube and social media can be an effective means to promote your business.

Sources:

Bennett, S. (2015, January 12). 70% of Marketers Will Increase Social Media Spend in 2015. Re

Bedgood, L. (2015, May 27). 4 Ways to Increase Revenue with Social Media.  http://www.business2community.com/social-media/4-ways-increase-revenue-social-media-01236612#MFtFfwE640O3MFPG.97

Bernie v Ted

A couple of weeks ago I posted an analysis comparing the online marketing of two presidential campaigns – Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, the front runners in their respective political parties.

This week I thought I would explore the current second place contenders – Bernie Sanders and Ted Cruz.

As a recap, a  compelling site includes relevant content that will engage the customer.  Secondly, the web site should appear in the top online searches.  This is not an endorsement or promotion of one candidate over the other.  It is simply an illustration and comparison of online marketing.    

Let’s recap what a components of a strong web site. 

1. Visually Appealing – It is the first impression of you or your company. 
2. Clean lines and text that is easy to read and uncluttered pages
3. Easy navigation.  Users should be able to see the website and know what the company is about and how to easily find products and
   Relevant content that is substantive and descriptive.

These web sites are both very similar in a lot of aspects and are more similar to the Donald Trump site where the home page is a clear declaration of the candidates positions.  For Bernie it is “Nobody who works 40 hours a week should be in poverty”. 

For Ted Cruz it is: Join the movement of Courageos Conservatives”

Ted Cruz also makes research and navigation a bit easier by including clear navigation buttons on his home page.

Both meet the guidelines for being clear, decriptive and relevant to what they stand for and impactful.

For Bernie, he has a click through link to go to his site.  This is where you are directed. This is a very powerful visual.  Pictures of a diverse selection of people and an another bold statement “This is your movement”.  The navigation to further elements of his campaign are on the left side and easily navigable.  The contribution button follows.

Both these campaign web sites meet the core requirements for a relevant web site.  They are both powerful presentations of the candidates and their positions.  Ted Cruz takes advantage of additional promotion of news and video clips son the bottom half of his web site which provides the opportunity for his campaign to present positive information.  Now I’ll test the remarketing efforts of the campaigns 

Social Media to drive sales

How are company’s using social media to get customer engagement and more sales?  How successful are those campaigns that provide you an incentive to “Like” them on Facebook?

Are you motivated to “Like” a company or product because you truly do or because of an incentive.  As a consumer on the other end, I think it dilutes the endorsements for all of the other businesses that receive “organic” or unsolicited endorsements.

I asked several 20 somethings how they chose companies’ and from which to make purchases.   Overwhelmingly, their first response was Facebook.  I probed a bit more to understand how valuable they thought advertising on Facebook was to their engagement with a company.  They noted they would definitely pay attention and search a company that a friend liked.  They are unlikely to engage with a random advertisement not linked to a friend’s “like”

With over more than 400 million users on Facebook, the platform provides a very useful tool for  advertisers at a reasonable cost.   At a minimum companies should try to devise strategies to encourage their customers and fans to “like” their page because the content is good or the product they sell excellent.  Advertising would be more impactful l for companies that have positive, enthusiastic users that want to promote their product.

So it’s not surprising that company’s plan to increase the amount of their emarketing, online and social media investments in 2016.  A recent article published on, “Advertising Age” quoted the HP director of strategy and planning-global media and digital marketing as saying, "I would expect our spending in this area to increase considerably over the next 18 months, specifically in the area of video," said Ed McLoughlin,

The VP-engagement at Cancer Treatment Centers of America said, "We just dipped our toe into the water this year, but I would say we'll see a five- to 10-times increase over what we spent this year," Native advertising is "definitely becoming a line item in the budget that we'll have dedicated dollars to put against because I believe it's working," he added.

http://adage.com/article/digital/native-ad-spending-jumps-marketers-reservations/295956/

The Social Media Examiner found that 93% of advertisers now use Social Media as a component of their marketing budget.

http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/how-marketers-use-paid-social-media/ 

There is a lot of opportunity out there for marketers to encourage customer engagement and get customers to engage online without investing a fortune on advertising.

 https://youtu.be/tIrS2zkWXY4?t=2    

Sources:

Redsicker, P. (2013, April 30). How Marketers Are Using Paid Social Media, New Research. Retrieved April 25, 2016, from http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/how-marketers-use-paid-social-media/

Sebastian, M. (2014, November 21). Native Ad Spending To Jump Despite Marketer Reservations. Retrieved April, 2016, from http://adage.com/article/digital/native-ad-spending-jumps-marketers-reservations/295956/

E. (2014, March 04). 10 Questions to Ask When Creating a Social-Media Marketing Plan. Retrieved April 25, 2016, from https://youtu.be/tIrS2zkWXY4?t=2

Campaign Web sites

 In 2016, an election year, there is certainly no shortage of political ads.  The ultimate marketing is a political campaign.  It is the marketing ideas, positions and ones self. 

In 2008, President Barack Obama’s campaign staff broke the traditional campaign format and leveraged the internet and digital marketing to have a significant impact.  The use of social media for engagement was unprecedented.  It was the first campaign that successfully used digital media to reach the masses. 

In 2016, it seems second nature.  However, while there is a lot on TV and news feeds online, I decided to look at the candidates' web sites to see what they are promoting.  Since Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are the current front runners I decided to compare their web sites.  This is not an endorsement or promotion of one candidate over the other.  I just picked these two to look at since they are the current leaders in their respective parties. 

First, let’s look at what makes a strong web site. 

1. Visually Appealing – It is the first impression of you or your company. 
2. Clean lines and text that is easy to read and uncluttered pages
3. Easy navigation.  Users should be able to see the website and know what the company is about and how to easily find products
4. Relevant content that is substantive and descriptive.

Both meet the guidelines for visually appealing.  They are also very clear as to what the web site is promoting. 

Donald Trump’s website was branded with his slogan, “Make America Great”  Also the top had clear navigation buttons – Positions, Get Involved, States, Media, Shop and Donate.  Further, scrolling down, there were news clips and video of articles and news the campaign wants to promote.  They are taking control of the messaging.

There is a multi prong approach to engagement.  First, the visitor can read about all of his positions.  There are also opportunities to get involved at the national level and state level.  If none of that appeals to you, you can shop for campaign paraphenalia.  You also have an opportunity to donate, which surprises me as isn’t this a self funded campaign?

The Hillary Clinton website looks good, but there is not much substance – if any.  While she is a known quantity and has been a public figure in the political scene much longer, I would expect to see more substance.  You cannot navigate anywhere on the site without first giving you email information.  From my first blog, you know this is my pet peeve with websites.  I like to browse and learn before I commit my personal information.  As a voter, I would like to be able to see all of her positions included on the site.  Without giving any personal information, there is nothing I can do.  This set up makes it hard to sway voters that may be on the fence and want to learn more.  Secondly, the campaign is not making it easy to donate and to support the campaign, whether it be with time or money.   It appears that she is letting a marketing opportunity get away and should use this digital space to better sell her brand - to promote campaign items or to promote her positions.

One strategy, the campaign has deployed is Remarketing.  Since I visited her website, I am now getting her website advertised to me while I am browsing.  That is sound marketing as it is reinforcing the campaign and the brand.